Galus v. Milner
430 N.E.2d 1314, 54 N.Y.2d 1019, 446 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3192
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. We cannot say that the order reinstating the jury’s verdict was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (Holland v Blake, 31 NY2d 734).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Galus v. Milner, 430 N.E.2d 1314, 54 N.Y.2d 1019, 446 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3192 (N.Y. 1981).
430 N.E.2d 1314 (Galus v. Milner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Buchanan
245 A.D.2d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)