Galu v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Ass'n

277 A.D.2d 350, 716 N.Y.S.2d 598, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12183

This text of 277 A.D.2d 350 (Galu v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Galu v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Ass'n, 277 A.D.2d 350, 716 N.Y.S.2d 598, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.),-dated October 5, 1999, which denied their motions pursuant to CPLR 8018 (a) to require each plaintiff to commence a separate action, and to require the out-of-State plaintiffs to provide security for costs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs (see, Warren v Cedar Hill Cemetery Assn., 277 AD2d 371 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, S. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warren v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Ass'n
277 A.D.2d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 350, 716 N.Y.S.2d 598, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galu-v-cedar-hill-cemetery-assn-nyappdiv-2000.