Galu v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Ass'n
Opinion
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.),-dated October 5, 1999, which denied their motions pursuant to CPLR 8018 (a) to require each plaintiff to commence a separate action, and to require the out-of-State plaintiffs to provide security for costs.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs (see, Warren v Cedar Hill Cemetery Assn., 277 AD2d 371 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, S. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
277 A.D.2d 350 (Galu v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.