Galtrof v. Aktiengesellschaft

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Galtrof v. Aktiengesellschaft

186 Misc. 107, 59 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2635

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 186 Misc. 107 (Galtrof v. Aktiengesellschaft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Galtrof v. Aktiengesellschaft, 186 Misc. 107, 59 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

It was error to deny the defendant’s motion for a stay. (See Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca, &c., 248 U. S. 9.) In the circumstances summary judgment should not have been granted.

The order denying motion for stay should be reversed, and motion granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. The judgment and order granting summary judgment should be vacated. The order of April 30, 1942, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed.

Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI