Galpine v. Duffe

861 S.W.2d 204, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1461, 1993 WL 360950
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1993·No. No. 62725·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mandamus proceeding, employee sought an order directing appellant, Secretary of the St. Louis City Civil Service Commission, to grant him a hearing. His petition alleged he had been improperly dismissed on the grounds that he was not a resident of the City.

A preliminary order in mandamus was issued on February 21, 1991. It directed the Secretary to file his answer by March 13. An answer is not in the legal file furnished us. Following a hearing, the preliminary order was made permanent.

The duty to prepare the legal file falls on an appellant. Rule 81.12(c). Further, “the legal file shall always include ... the pleadings upon which the action was tried....” Rule 81.12(a).

Without the answer, we do not know what issues, if any, were framed by the pleadings. See Rule 55.09. It is appellant’s duty to furnish the records necessary to review issues. See Davis v. Long, 521 S.W.2d 7, 8 (Mo.App.S.D.1975). In their absence, “there is nothing for an appellate court to decide.” Id at 9.

The appeal is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Galpine v. Duffe, 861 S.W.2d 204, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1461, 1993 WL 360950 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

861 S.W.2d 204 (Galpine v. Duffe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manard v. Williams
952 S.W.2d 387 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)
Abel ex rel. Abel v. Mike Russell's Standard Service
901 S.W.2d 299 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995)