Galluchat v. Pittman

Fourth Circuit

Galluchat v. Pittman

288 F. 928, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2249

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1923·No. No. 2033·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The reasoning of the District Judge in his decree refusing to remand the case to the state court, and in the final decree dismissing the complaint on the merits, is so full and convincing that nothing of substance can be added. Colleton Mercantile & Manufacturing Co. v. Savannah River Lumber Co., 280 'Fed. 358, decided by this court since the trial, supports the District Judge in refusing to remand the cause.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The reasoning of the District Judge in his decree refusing to remand the case to the state court, and in the final decree dismissing the complaint on the merits, is so full and convincing that nothing of substance can be added. Colleton Mercantile & Manufacturing Co. v. Savannah River Lumber Co., 280 'Fed. 358, decided by this court since the trial, supports the District Judge in refusing to remand the cause.

Affirmed.

Galluchat v. Pittman, 288 F. 928, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2249 (4th Cir. 1923).

Pincite

288 F. 928 (Galluchat v. Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related