Galloway v. Wages

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION

CHARLES D. GALLOWAY PLAINTIFF

V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-00007-RP

MASON WAGES, ANNA ROBBINS, JEFF CHISM, CHRIS ROBERTSON, and MISSISSIPPI DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Charles D. Galloway’s motion [28] for reconsideration of the Court’s order denying his motions for discovery and motion [29] for “emergence attention to this matter.” In the instant motions, Plaintiff asks this Court, yet again, to aid him in defending against the state criminal charges lodged against him. See Doc. #s 28, 29. Federal district courts, however, do not interfere with or supervise on-going state court criminal proceedings. Anderson v. Humphreys County Sheriff’s Dept., 2008 WL 192098, at *1 (N.D. Miss. Jan. 23, 2008). Moreover, the Court recently dismissed the instant action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Doc. #s 26, 27. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motions [28],[29] are not well-taken and are, therefore, DENIED. SO ORDERED, this the 31st day of March, 2020.

/s/ Roy Percy UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE