Galloway v. Union Trust Co.

E.D. Arkansas

Galloway v. Union Trust Co.

9 F. Supp. 575, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1248

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided December 8, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MARTINEAU, District Judge.

Only the constitutionality of the FrazierLemke Act (Bankr. Act § 75 (s), 11 USCA § 203 (s) is involved at this time.

No appellate court has passed upon this question. In a very able and comprehensive opinion, delivered November 14, 1934, by Judge Dawson of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, in Re William W. Radford, Sr., 8 F.Supp. 489, the constitutionality of the act was upheld. The reasoning of that decision is sound in my opinion and is adopted here.

Decrees upholding the Frazier-Lemke Act may be entered in all cases where its validity is attacked.

RAGON, District Judge, concurs in this holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARTINEAU, District Judge.

Only the constitutionality of the FrazierLemke Act (Bankr. Act § 75 (s), 11 USCA § 203 (s) is involved at this time.

No appellate court has passed upon this question. In a very able and comprehensive opinion, delivered November 14, 1934, by Judge Dawson of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, in Re William W. Radford, Sr., 8 F.Supp. 489, the constitutionality of the act was upheld. The reasoning of that decision is sound in my opinion and is adopted here.

Decrees upholding the Frazier-Lemke Act may be entered in all cases where its validity is attacked.

RAGON, District Judge, concurs in this holding.

Galloway v. Union Trust Co., 9 F. Supp. 575, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1248 (E.D. Ark. 1934).

Pincite

9 F. Supp. 575 (Galloway v. Union Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related