Galloway v. . Stone

182 S.E. 333, 208 N.C. 739, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 116
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 20, 1935·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Devin, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether a permanent injunction was proper. Defendants concede that the facts found by the court below are sufficient to justify a continuance to the hearing, but they maintain they are entitled to a day in court to determine in some proper way the issues raised by the pleadings; and in this we concur.

A j>ermanent or perpetual injunction issues as a final judgment which settles the rights of the parties, after the determination of all issues raised. McIntosh N. C. Prac. & Proc., secs. 848, 849; Abernethy v. Burns, 206 N. C., 370.

This disposition of the appeal renders unnecessary a discussion of the other questions presented on the argument and by brief.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Galloway v. . Stone, 182 S.E. 333, 208 N.C. 739, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 116 (N.C. 1935).

182 S.E. 333 (Galloway v. . Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. North Carolina State Bar
678 S.E.2d 602 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION v. Davis
116 S.E.2d 792 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Cauble v. Bell
107 S.E.2d 557 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
State ex rel. Thompson v. District Court
313 P.2d 1034 (Montana Supreme Court, 1957)
Tomlinson v. Cranor
184 S.E. 554 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)