Gallonty v. New York City Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gallonty v. New York City Board of Elections

224 A.D.2d 563, 638 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1996·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16 to validate petitions designating Frances Gallonty, Michael A. Kalson, and Joel L. Linton as candidates in a primary election to be held on March 7, 1996, for the Republican Party party positions of delegates and Anthony Santos, Charles J. Rose, and Bessie M. Robinson as alternate delegates, respectively, for the 15th Congressional District to the 1996 Republican National Convention, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated February 6, 1996, which, after a hearing, denied the application and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the objectors substantially complied with the Board of Elections’ rules regarding the filing of specifications of objections to designating petitions (see, Matter of Sullivan v New York City Bd. of Elections, 224 AD2d 565 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16 to validate petitions designating Frances Gallonty, Michael A. Kalson, and Joel L. Linton as candidates in a primary election to be held on March 7, 1996, for the Republican Party party positions of delegates and Anthony Santos, Charles J. Rose, and Bessie M. Robinson as alternate delegates, respectively, for the 15th Congressional District to the 1996 Republican National Convention, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated February 6, 1996, which, after a hearing, denied the application and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the objectors substantially complied with the Board of Elections’ rules regarding the filing of specifications of objections to designating petitions (see, Matter of Sullivan v New York City Bd. of Elections, 224 AD2d 565 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Gallonty v. New York City Board of Elections, 224 A.D.2d 563, 638 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

224 A.D.2d 563 (Gallonty v. New York City Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related