Gallo v. State

532 So. 2d 1135, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2382, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4692, 1988 WL 110998
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 1988
DocketNo. 88-1021
StatusPublished

This text of 532 So. 2d 1135 (Gallo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallo v. State, 532 So. 2d 1135, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2382, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4692, 1988 WL 110998 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand with directions that the trial court either attach portions of the record conclusively rebutting appellant’s allegations set out in his motion for post-conviction relief, or, alternatively, that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel specifically set out and sworn to in his motion.

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
532 So. 2d 1135, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2382, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4692, 1988 WL 110998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallo-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.