Gallo v. Savings Bank Life Insurance Fund

257 A.D.2d 600, 684 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 320
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 19, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 257 A.D.2d 600 (Gallo v. Savings Bank Life Insurance Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallo v. Savings Bank Life Insurance Fund, 257 A.D.2d 600, 684 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy, the [601]*601plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated November 10, 1997, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied her cross motion to strike the defendants’ answer for failure to comply with discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In an action to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy, the Statute of Limitations begins to run upon the death of the insured (see, e.g., Continental Cas. Co. v Stronghold Ins. Co., 866 F Supp 143, 145, n 1, affd 77 F3d 16; Shaw v Union Mut. Life Ins. Co., 91 Misc 2d 64; see also, Stewart v Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co., 266 App Div 617, 619, affd 293 NY 674). Such a rule comports with the reasoning that in, at least, certain types of insurance, a cause of action accrues immediately upon the happening of the loss insured against, because that is when a claim may be brought and the proceeds of the policy are due (see, e.g., Continental Cas. Co. v Stronghold Ins. Co., supra, at 20). Accordingly, because Joseph Gallo died on December 1, 1988, his wife had until December 1, 1994, to sue for the proceeds of his life insurance policy, and the instant action, commenced in July 1996, is time-barred.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grunblatt v. First Unum Life Insurance
19 A.D.3d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D.2d 600, 684 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallo-v-savings-bank-life-insurance-fund-nyappdiv-1999.