Gallo v. Hirsch-Fortune, Inc.
This text of 84 A.D.2d 806 (Gallo v. Hirsch-Fortune, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kartell, J.), dated August 20, 1980, which denied its motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiff served her complaint some 28 months after her attorney had returned to work following an illness. Her failure to offer any excuse for this inordinate delay made it an abuse of discretion for Special Term to have denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action. (See Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594; Kahn v Columbo, 74 AD2d 622.) Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.2d 806, 444 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallo-v-hirsch-fortune-inc-nyappdiv-1981.