Gallo v. Facilities Development Corp.

259 A.D.2d 1044, 689 N.Y.S.2d 902
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1999
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 1044 (Gallo v. Facilities Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallo v. Facilities Development Corp., 259 A.D.2d 1044, 689 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Appeal by third-party plaintiffs Pike/McCarthy, The Pike Company, Inc., and McCarthy Brothers Company unanimously dismissed upon stipulation and order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Third-party plaintiff The Facilities Development Corporation did not raise the issue of its entitlement to counsel fees and disbursements in its brief. That issue is therefore deemed abandoned (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Lunn, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Hurlbutt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora
202 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 1044, 689 N.Y.S.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallo-v-facilities-development-corp-nyappdiv-1999.