Galligan v. Groten

16 Misc. 689, 38 N.Y.S. 1144, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 868
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedApril 15, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Misc. 689 (Galligan v. Groten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Galligan v. Groten, 16 Misc. 689, 38 N.Y.S. 1144, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 868 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

There is riot a single fact alleged in the affidavits

upon which the attachment herein was granted that showsthat the defendant was about to assign, dispose of or secrete his property with the intent to hinder, delay and defraud his creditors (the ground upon which the same was issued), the attachment was, [690]*690therefore, rightfully vacated and the order appealed from must be . affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, Oh. J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Misc. 689, 38 N.Y.S. 1144, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galligan-v-groten-nynyccityct-1896.