Galligan v. Groten
This text of 16 Misc. 689 (Galligan v. Groten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is riot a single fact alleged in the affidavits
upon which the attachment herein was granted that showsthat the defendant was about to assign, dispose of or secrete his property with the intent to hinder, delay and defraud his creditors (the ground upon which the same was issued), the attachment was, [690]*690therefore, rightfully vacated and the order appealed from must be . affirmed, with costs.
Van Wyck, Oh. J., concurs.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Misc. 689, 38 N.Y.S. 1144, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galligan-v-groten-nynyccityct-1896.