Gallier v. State

182 S.W. 306, 78 Tex. Crim. 534, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 12, 1916·No. No. 3901.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PBENDEBGAST, PresidiNg Judge.

Appellant was convicted of •ordinary burglary, not of a private residence, and his punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary. The jury in their verdict found proper facts and recommended a suspension of his sentence. This the court did in his judgment. Upon the court overruling his motion for a mew trial, he gave notice of appeal to this court. The trial court should mot have permitted notice of appeal to have been given, for, under the suspended sentence law, an accused can not appeal from the conviction, and can only do so when proper sentence is later, if at all, pronounced against him. Bierman v. State, 73 Texas Crim. Rep., 284. The appeal in this case is, therefore, dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gallier v. State, 182 S.W. 306, 78 Tex. Crim. 534, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22 (Tex. 1916).

182 S.W. 306 (Gallier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitch v. State
235 S.W.2d 896 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1951)
Millican v. State
167 S.W.2d 188 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Lamkin v. State
136 S.W.2d 225 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
State v. Liliopoulos
5 P.2d 319 (Washington Supreme Court, 1931)