Gallettley v. Barrackman

Indiana Supreme Court

Gallettley v. Barrackman

12 Ind. 379

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 1859·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is not such an assignment of errors in this case as enables us to look into it. It was an application by an administrator for a proper order, &c., to authorize him to sell real estate of the deceased, for the payment of debts. Defense was made by the heir. Order of sale made. The only assignment of errors is, that the judgment should have been for Gallettley, and not for Barrackman. Abraham v. Chase, 11 Ind. R. 513.—Id. 536. —2 R. S. p. 161.

The appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is not such an assignment of errors in this case as enables us to look into it. It was an application by an administrator for a proper order, &c., to authorize him to sell real estate of the deceased, for the payment of debts. Defense was made by the heir. Order of sale made. The only assignment of errors is, that the judgment should have been for Gallettley, and not for Barrackman. Abraham v. Chase, 11 Ind. R. 513.—Id. 536. —2 R. S. p. 161.

The appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Gallettley v. Barrackman, 12 Ind. 379 (Ind. 1859).

Pincite

12 Ind. 379 (Gallettley v. Barrackman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related