Gallettley v. Barrackman

Indiana Supreme Court

Gallettley v. Barrackman

12 Ind. 379

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 2, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 12 Ind. 379 (Gallettley v. Barrackman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gallettley v. Barrackman, 12 Ind. 379 (Ind. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is not such an assignment of errors in this case as enables us to look into it. It was an application by an administrator for a proper order, &c., to authorize him to sell real estate of the deceased, for the payment of debts. Defense was made by the heir. Order of sale made. The only assignment of errors is, that the judgment should have been for Gallettley, and not for Barrackman. Abraham v. Chase, 11 Ind. R. 513.—Id. 536. —2 R. S. p. 161.

The appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is not such an assignment of errors in this case as enables us to look into it. It was an application by an administrator for a proper order, &c., to authorize him to sell real estate of the deceased, for the payment of debts. Defense was made by the heir. Order of sale made. The only assignment of errors is, that the judgment should have been for Gallettley, and not for Barrackman. Abraham v. Chase, 11 Ind. R. 513.—Id. 536. —2 R. S. p. 161.

The appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Ind. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallettley-v-barrackman-ind-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack