Gallegos v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Gallegos v. People

2 P.3d 716, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2907, 2000 Colo. LEXIS 731, 2000 WL 684788

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedMay 30, 2000

DocketNo. 98SC284

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 P.3d 716 (Gallegos v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gallegos v. People, 2 P.3d 716, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2907, 2000 Colo. LEXIS 731, 2000 WL 684788 (Colo. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Kourlis and Justice Rice are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, 975 P.2d 1135 (Colo.App.1998), should be affirmed, whereas Justice Hobbs, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice COATS does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Kourlis and Justice Rice are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, 975 P.2d 1135 (Colo.App.1998), should be affirmed, whereas Justice Hobbs, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice COATS does not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 P.3d 716, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2907, 2000 Colo. LEXIS 731, 2000 WL 684788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallegos-v-people-colo-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack