Gallegos v. Dobre
This text of Gallegos v. Dobre (Gallegos v. Dobre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41536 Conference Calendar
JOSE SANTOS GALLEGOS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
JONATHON DOBRE, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-158 --------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Santos Gallegos, federal prisoner #18816-077, appeals
from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
petition. Gallegos argues that the district court erred by
holding that his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition was subject to
dismissal because it did not warrant application of the “savings
clause” set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Because Gallegos’s claim fails to meet the requisite
standard, the “savings clause” is not applicable to Gallegos’s
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-41536 -2-
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. See Reyes-Requena v. United States,
243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gallegos v. Dobre, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallegos-v-dobre-ca5-2004.