Gallego v. State
782 So. 2d 968, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4749, 2001 WL 356958
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2193·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to defendant filing a timely and legally sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, that shall not be considered successive. Futch v. State, 781 So.2d 462 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gallego v. State, 782 So. 2d 968, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4749, 2001 WL 356958 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
782 So. 2d 968 (Gallego v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parks v. State
782 So. 2d 968 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)