Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank
186 U.S. 177, 22 S. Ct. 811, 46 L. Ed. 1111, 1902 U.S. LEXIS 884
Opinion
This is an application for leave to prosecute a writ of erroi; to a state court, without giving security
*178 as required by section 1000 of the Revised Statutes, under an act of Congress of July 20,. 1892. 27 Stat. 252.
. The motion must be denied. Our ruling has uniformly been, and has been enforced in repeated instances that that act has no application to proceedings in this court.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank, 186 U.S. 177, 22 S. Ct. 811, 46 L. Ed. 1111, 1902 U.S. LEXIS 884 (1902).
186 U.S. 177 (Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGee
314 F.2d 598 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of Boston
35 N.E.2d 246 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Horrabin v. City of Iowa City
160 Iowa 650 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
Bradford v. Southern Railway Co.
195 U.S. 243 (Supreme Court, 1904)