Home/Supreme Court/Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank

Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank

186 U.S. 177, 22 S. Ct. 811, 46 L. Ed. 1111, 1902 U.S. LEXIS 884
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 2, 1902
Docket3r
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 186 U.S. 177 (Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank, 186 U.S. 177, 22 S. Ct. 811, 46 L. Ed. 1111, 1902 U.S. LEXIS 884 (1902).

Opinion

The Chief Justice.

This is an application for leave to prosecute a writ of erroi; to a state court, without giving security

*178 as required by section 1000 of the Revised Statutes, under an act of Congress of July 20,. 1892. 27 Stat. 252.

. The motion must be denied. Our ruling has uniformly been, and has been enforced in repeated instances that that act has no application to proceedings in this court.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGee
314 F.2d 598 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of Boston
35 N.E.2d 246 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Horrabin v. City of Iowa City
160 Iowa 650 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
Bradford v. Southern Railway Co.
195 U.S. 243 (Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 U.S. 177, 22 S. Ct. 811, 46 L. Ed. 1111, 1902 U.S. LEXIS 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallaway-v-fort-worth-bank-scotus-1902.