Gallatin v. Sherman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Gallatin v. Sherman

77 F. 337, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2960

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided December 5, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion to remand is denied. _ In _ retaining jurisdiction, however, this court will so arrange for hearing that the landlord may obtain a summary disposition of the case such as the state statutes give him. Having already had a notice of several weeks, the defendants will be expected to present whatever defense they may have to the dispossession on four days’ notice. Upon (lie settlement of this order time and place for hearing may be arranged for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion to remand is denied. _ In _ retaining jurisdiction, however, this court will so arrange for hearing that the landlord may obtain a summary disposition of the case such as the state statutes give him. Having already had a notice of several weeks, the defendants will be expected to present whatever defense they may have to the dispossession on four days’ notice. Upon (lie settlement of this order time and place for hearing may be arranged for.

Gallatin v. Sherman, 77 F. 337, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2960 (circtsdny 1896).

Pincite

77 F. 337 (Gallatin v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related