Gallardo v. United States Federal Government

466 F. App'x 5
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 2012
DocketNo. 11-5312
StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 5 (Gallardo v. United States Federal Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallardo v. United States Federal Government, 466 F. App'x 5 (D.C. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed October 17, 2011, be affirmed. The district court correctly held that appellant may not challenge his conviction or sentence through an action for injunctive or declaratory relief. See Williams v. Hill, 74 F.3d 1339, 1340 (D.C.Cir.1996) (per curiam) (denying prisoner’s claims for injunctive and declaratory relief because “it is well-settled that a prisoner seeking relief from his conviction or sentence may not bring such an action”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert L. Williams v. Leo C. Hill
74 F.3d 1339 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F. App'x 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallardo-v-united-states-federal-government-cadc-2012.