Gallardo v. State
This text of 849 S.W.2d 825 (Gallardo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Gallardo v. State, 809 S.W.2d 540 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1991). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review to review the Court of Appeals’ holding that Article 37.-07(3)(a), V.A.C.C.P., as amended, allows admission of unadjudicated extraneous offenses in the punishment phase of trial in a non-capital offense.
Recently this Court decided in Grunsfeld v. State, 843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), that evidence of extraneous offenses is not admissible at the punishment phase of trial in a non-capital offense unless it satisfies the definition of “prior criminal record” under Art. 37.07(3)(a). Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Grunsfeld, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
849 S.W.2d 825, 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 66, 1993 WL 89332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallardo-v-state-texcrimapp-1993.