Gallardo v. Hannah

49 Cal. 136
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1874·No. No. 3,686·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The petition for the writ does not comply with the rule of this Court, by setting forth any sufficient reason why the application should not be made to the District Judge.

A petition of this kind cannot be made the vehicle of insulting the District Courts, and we only decline to notice the action of the petitioner further because we believe him incapable of appreciating the effect of the language he has employed. Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gallardo v. Hannah, 49 Cal. 136 (Cal. 1874).

49 Cal. 136 (Gallardo v. Hannah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Kocourek v. City of Chicago & Schlesinger & Meyer
193 Ill. 507 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)
Everitt v. Board County Commissioners
47 N.W. 296 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)