Gallant v. Deutsche Bank
This text of Gallant v. Deutsche Bank (Gallant v. Deutsche Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1502
ANN KARIMA GALLANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00006-gec)
Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ann Karima Gallant, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Margerum Johnson, III, Glen Howard Sturtevant, Jr., HUNTON & WILLIAMS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ann Karima Gallant appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for entry of default. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
Gallant seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gallant v. Deutsche Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallant-v-deutsche-bank-ca4-2010.