Gallant v. Deutsche Bank

403 F. App'x 871
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2010·No. No. 10-1502·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ann Karima Gallant appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for entry of default. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Gallant seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable [872] interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gallant v. Deutsche Bank, 403 F. App'x 871 (4th Cir. 2010).

403 F. App'x 871 (Gallant v. Deutsche Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rockville Housing Enterprises v. Deborah Redman
691 F. App'x 766 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)