Gallagher v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Gallagher v. Whitney

23 A. 560, 147 Pa. 184, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 808

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 25, 1892

DocketAppeal, No. 444

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 23 A. 560 (Gallagher v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gallagher v. Whitney, 23 A. 560, 147 Pa. 184, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 808 (Pa. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The only serious complaint here is that the learned judge below erred in his charge to the jury upon the measure of damages. The ingenious argument of the counsel for the appellant has failed to satisfy us that the court committed error. An examination of that portion of the charge contained in the second specification, shows that the learned judge was correct in his calculation, while the rule laid down for the measure of damages, contained in the first specification, is entirely accurate.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The only serious complaint here is that the learned judge below erred in his charge to the jury upon the measure of damages. The ingenious argument of the counsel for the appellant has failed to satisfy us that the court committed error. An examination of that portion of the charge contained in the second specification, shows that the learned judge was correct in his calculation, while the rule laid down for the measure of damages, contained in the first specification, is entirely accurate.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A. 560, 147 Pa. 184, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallagher-v-whitney-pa-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack