Gallagher v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gallagher v. State

313 S.W.3d 708, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 804, 2010 WL 2378933

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 2010·No. ED 93698·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Gallagher (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 24.035 to Vacate, *709 Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence (Amended Motion.) 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Gallagher (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 24.035 to Vacate, *709 Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence (Amended Motion.) 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Gallagher v. State, 313 S.W.3d 708, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 804, 2010 WL 2378933 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

313 S.W.3d 708 (Gallagher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.