Gallagher v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gallagher v. State

157 S.W.3d 411, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 400, 2005 WL 589310

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

DocketWD 64223

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 S.W.3d 411 (Gallagher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gallagher v. State, 157 S.W.3d 411, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 400, 2005 WL 589310 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying Appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion. Appellant filed this motion seeking to vacate his conviction for driving while intoxicated, for which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of seven years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying Appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion. Appellant filed this motion seeking to vacate his conviction for driving while intoxicated, for which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of seven years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.3d 411, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 400, 2005 WL 589310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallagher-v-state-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack