Gallagher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gallagher v. State

199 So. 2d 501, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4896

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1967·No. Nos. 66-690, 66-691, 66-692 and 66-697·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only substantial question presented on this appeal from four convictions for uttering forged instruments is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance of trial. The motion was made at the time the cause was called for trial. The only basis for continuance advanced was appellant’s wish to have a longer time to make restitution. The court had previously granted a continuance for the same purpose.

Error has not been demonstrated. See Vitiello v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 629, 631.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only substantial question presented on this appeal from four convictions for uttering forged instruments is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance of trial. The motion was made at the time the cause was called for trial. The only basis for continuance advanced was appellant’s wish to have a longer time to make restitution. The court had previously granted a continuance for the same purpose.

Error has not been demonstrated. See Vitiello v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 629, 631.

Affirmed.

Gallagher v. State, 199 So. 2d 501, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4896 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

199 So. 2d 501 (Gallagher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related