Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gallagher v. State

Gallagher v. State

199 So. 2d 501, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4896
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 1967
DocketNos. 66-690, 66-691, 66-692 and 66-697
StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 2d 501 (Gallagher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallagher v. State, 199 So. 2d 501, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4896 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only substantial question presented on this appeal from four convictions for uttering forged instruments is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance of trial. The motion was made at the time the cause was called for trial. The only basis for continuance advanced was appellant’s wish to have a longer time to make restitution. The court had previously granted a continuance for the same purpose.

Error has not been demonstrated. See Vitiello v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 629, 631.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vitiello v. State
167 So. 2d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 2d 501, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallagher-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.