Gallagher v. Sacks

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1961
DocketNo. 36578
StatusPublished

This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37 (Gallagher v. Sacks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallagher v. Sacks, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37 (Ohio 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell» Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallagher-v-sacks-ohio-1961.