Gallagher v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

608 So. 2d 855, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10758, 1992 WL 279860
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1992·No. No. 91-2919·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Gallaghers commenced this action for injuries caused by exposure to the ap-pellee’s product, on theories of negligence and strict liability. This appeal is brought, after an adverse jury verdict on the negligence count, from a pretrial omnibus order which dismissed the strict liability count. We reverse for a trial on the authority of Beraglia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 606 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), which holds that a plaintiff in an asbestos litigation is entitled to proceed to trial on a strict liability claim so long as the claim does not duplicate the negligence claim.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gallagher v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 608 So. 2d 855, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10758, 1992 WL 279860 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 855 (Gallagher v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheelock v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Division of Dresser Industries, Inc.
608 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Martinez v. LIFEMARK HOSPITAL OF FLA.
608 So. 2d 855 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)