Gallagher v. Philipps

District Court, S.D. California·Decided September 29, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-00993·Unknown

Opinion

EDWARD R. GALLAGHER, Case No.: 20cv993-JLS(BLM)

Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE v. DAVID PHILIPPS and KENNETH JOHN BRAITHWAITE, II, in his capacity as Secretary of the Navy, Defendants. On September 28, 2020, Defendant David Philips (“Defendant”) filed an Ex Parte Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference (“ENE”) and Case Management Conference (“CMC”). ECF No. 28. Defendant requests that the Court stay the ENE and CMC until District Judge Janis L. Sammartino rules on Defendant’s pending motion to strike or, alternatively, dismisses Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (the “Anti-SLAPP Motion”). Id. at 2. In support of his motion, Defendant states “Plaintiff’s claims target Mr. Philips’s constitutionally protected speech” and “[c]ourts have made clear that early dismissal at the pleading stage is especially appropriate in cases . . . that invoke significant First Amendment rights.” Id. (citing Winter v. DC Comics, 30 Cal. 4th 881, 892 (2003)). In further support, Defendant states that he anticipates that his pending Anti-SLAPP Motion will resolve all of Plaintiff’s claims against him. Id. at 2. Defendant notes that, upon notifying the other parties in the instant action, Plaintiff’s counsel informed him that he intends to file an opposition to Defendant's Motion and counsel Defendant Kenneth John Braithwaite II stated that he had “no objection to postponing the ENE Conference and other discovery matters until the Anti-SLAPP Motion is decided, but opposes postponing the CMC absent a broader discovery stay.” Id. at n. 1.; ECF No. 28-1, Declaration }of Thomas R. Burke in Support of Defendant David Philips’s Ex Parte Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference, at §] 4. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY SETS the following briefing schedule: 1. Any opposition to Defendant Philipps’s motion must be filed on or before October 2, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. 2. Any reply must be filed on or before October 6, 2020. Upon completion of the briefing, the Court will take the matter under submission pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and no personal appearances will be required. IT 1S SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/29/2020 lobe Mager Hon. Barbara L. Major United States Maaistrate Judae

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gallagher v. Philipps, (S.D. Cal. 2020).

Gallagher v. Philipps (Gallagher v. Philipps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winter v. DC Comics
69 P.3d 473 (California Supreme Court, 2003)