Gallagher v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

287 F. Supp. 610, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9506
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided March 18, 1968·No. Civ. A. No. 68-588·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

FULLAM, District Judge.

The named defendant is not a “person” within the meaning of 42 U.S. C.A. § 1983, and may not be sued thereunder. Williams v. Craven, 273 F.Supp. 649 (C.D.Calif.1967); Taylor v. Penn[611]*611sylvania Board of Parole, 263 F.Supp. 450 (M.D.Pa.1967).

The allegations of the complaint are insufficient to raise any issue of constitutional dimension. Moreover, the plaintiff made similar allegations in his petition for habeas corpus, but failed to produce any evidence to support the charges (Misc. No. 3530).

For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff’s petition for leave to proceed in forma pau/peris, and petition for the appointment of counsel, will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gallagher v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 287 F. Supp. 610, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9506 (E.D. Pa. 1968).

287 F. Supp. 610 (Gallagher v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gallagher v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
287 F. Supp. 610 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1968)