Gallagher v. Lehigh Valley R.

55 F. Supp. 1022, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2348
District Court, E.D. New York·Decided March 9, 1944·No. Civil Action No. 3436·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

GALSTON, District Judge.

The motion to set aside the verdict of the jury and for judgment in favor of the defendant must in all respects be denied. There was ample evidence from which the jury could draw the conclusion that the proximate cause of the injuries which the plaintiff sustained was owing solely to the negligence of the defendant. As to the amount of the verdict there is no reason why I should substitute my estimate for that of the jury. The injuries were of a serious nature, painful and disabling, and to a man of the plaintiff’s fine appearance, doubtless humiliating. Finally, the chatter of counsel with members of the jury after rendition of the verdict I must and do entirely disregard. McDonald v. Pless, 238 U.S. 264, 35 S.Ct. 783, 59 L.Ed. 1300. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gallagher v. Lehigh Valley R., 55 F. Supp. 1022, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2348 (E.D.N.Y. 1944).

55 F. Supp. 1022 (Gallagher v. Lehigh Valley R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meehan v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey
181 F. Supp. 594 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Cunningham v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
55 F. Supp. 1012 (E.D. New York, 1944)