Gallagher v. Kilkeary

29 Ill. App. 600, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 192
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 27, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ill. App. 600 (Gallagher v. Kilkeary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallagher v. Kilkeary, 29 Ill. App. 600, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 192 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a motion to re-docket the cause and to set aside the final order entered in the cause at the August term, 1888, of this court, reversing and remanding the cause.

The ground of this motion -is that this court had no jurisdiction to hear the cause for the reason that the will involved in the case devised real estate in fee and therefore involved a freehold.

Ho question was made on the hearing of the writ of error in this court as to the jurisdiction of tliiscourt. In numerous cases of the same kind as this the Appellate Court assumed jurisdiction to hear and decide the cases, and the same afterward were taken to the Supreme Court, and the latter court in none of them questioned the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court. Calvert v. Carpenter, 96 Ill. p. 63; Long v. Long, 107 Ill. 210; McMillan et al. v. McDill et al., 110 Ill. 47; American Bible Soc. v. Price, 115 Ill. 623.

These cases show that the practice of both the Appellate and Supreme Courts has recognized such cases as within the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court.

• Whether this is the correct practice we do not feel called upon now to decide. It is sufficient to dispose of this motion to say that, whether this court had jurisdiction of the case or not, it has passed beyond our control and we have no power to set aside a final order or decree of this court made at a, former term of the court.

We hold that our power over the case ceased when the August term of this court terminated without a petition for rehearing, and any action we might now take would be without authority and void.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. Long
107 Ill. 210 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1883)
McMillan v. McDill
110 Ill. 47 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1884)
American Bible Society v. Price
5 N.E. 126 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Ill. App. 600, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallagher-v-kilkeary-illappct-1889.