Gallagher v. Federal Mortgage

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided February 18, 1994·No. 93-2171·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


February 18, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 93-2171

ROBERT J. GALLAGHER,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]

____________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Robert J. Gallagher on brief pro se.
___________________

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. Appellant has no federal
____________

constitutional right to appellate review of a state lower

court decision. McKane v. Durston, 153 U.S. 684, 687 (1894).
______ _______

Regardless whether or not the New Hampshire Supreme Court

chooses to review a state court ruling, lower federal courts

lack jurisdiction to review state court decisions. The

dismissal of appellant's action is affirmed for the reasons

stated in the magistrate's August 17, 1993 report.

Affirmed.
________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gallagher v. Federal Mortgage, (1st Cir. 1994).

Gallagher v. Federal Mortgage (Gallagher v. Federal Mortgage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKane v. Durston
153 U.S. 684 (Supreme Court, 1894)