Gallagher v. City of Bayonne
259 A.2d 912, 55 N.J. 159, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 161
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Collester in the Appellate Division, 106 N. J. Super. 401. We have considered the proffer of proof made on behalf of the defendants. It is our view that the offer made could not affect the result.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Wbintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-MAN — 7.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gallagher v. City of Bayonne, 259 A.2d 912, 55 N.J. 159, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 161 (N.J. 1969).
259 A.2d 912 (Gallagher v. City of Bayonne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Homemaker Serv. v. Bd. of Chosen
883 A.2d 1074 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Singer v. Township of Princeton
860 A.2d 475 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
PATERSON TAV. & GRILL OWNERS ASSN. v. Bor. of Hawthorne
270 A.2d 628 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1970)