Gallagher v. Brandt
This text of 52 Ill. 80 (Gallagher v. Brandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This was an action of trespass, in which the plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for one hundred dollars, and the defendants appealed. It is urged by appellees’ counsel that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. That question, however, is not before us, for the bill of exceptions does not purport to embody all the evidence. Eo objection is urged by counsel to the ruling of the court upon the instructions, and we discover no error in regard to them.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Ill. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallagher-v-brandt-ill-1869.