Gallagher v. Bitz

587 F. App'x 765
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 2014
DocketNo. 14-2008
StatusPublished

This text of 587 F. App'x 765 (Gallagher v. Bitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gallagher v. Bitz, 587 F. App'x 765 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Robert Gallagher appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gallagher’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gallagher has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Galla[766]*766gher’s motion to expedite decision and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 F. App'x 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallagher-v-bitz-ca4-2014.