Gallagher v. Bechtel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gallagher v. Bechtel Corp.

245 A.D.2d 36, 664 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12499

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 36 (Gallagher v. Bechtel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gallagher v. Bechtel Corp., 245 A.D.2d 36, 664 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered July 11, 1996, which, in an action by a laborer for personal injuries sustained in a fall from a scaffold, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), and denied the cross motion of third-party defendant, plaintiffs employer, for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The conflicting affidavits do not permit, as a matter of law, on a motion for summary judgment, the finding, made by the motion court, that the scaffold from which plaintiff fell tipped because one of its wheels got caught in an unguarded hole in the floor across which the scaffold was being pushed. Nevertheless, it is clear that the injury resulted from an elevation-related risk. Plaintiffs were properly awarded summary judgment against the owner and general contractor under Labor Law § 240 (1), since plaintiffs established there was a violation of the statute and that such violation was the proximate cause of the injury (Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply, 82 NY2d 555). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered July 11, 1996, which, in an action by a laborer for personal injuries sustained in a fall from a scaffold, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), and denied the cross motion of third-party defendant, plaintiffs employer, for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The conflicting affidavits do not permit, as a matter of law, on a motion for summary judgment, the finding, made by the motion court, that the scaffold from which plaintiff fell tipped because one of its wheels got caught in an unguarded hole in the floor across which the scaffold was being pushed. Nevertheless, it is clear that the injury resulted from an elevation-related risk. Plaintiffs were properly awarded summary judgment against the owner and general contractor under Labor Law § 240 (1), since plaintiffs established there was a violation of the statute and that such violation was the proximate cause of the injury (Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply, 82 NY2d 555). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rubin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 36, 664 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gallagher-v-bechtel-corp-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack