Galimi v. Galimi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Galimi v. Galimi

278 A.D.2d 197, 716 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12602

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 197 (Galimi v. Galimi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Galimi v. Galimi, 278 A.D.2d 197, 716 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[198]*198In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants Paul A. Galimi, Sr., Edgewater Auto Parts, Inc., and PAG Realty Corp. appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered May 25, 1999, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to strike their answer.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Subsequent to the entry on May 25, 1999, of the order appealed from, a final judgment was entered against the defendants. Accordingly, the appeal from the intermediate order entered May 25, 1999, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). By decision and order of this Court dated April 3, 2000, the appeal from the judgment was deemed withdrawn. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[198]*198In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants Paul A. Galimi, Sr., Edgewater Auto Parts, Inc., and PAG Realty Corp. appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered May 25, 1999, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to strike their answer.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Subsequent to the entry on May 25, 1999, of the order appealed from, a final judgment was entered against the defendants. Accordingly, the appeal from the intermediate order entered May 25, 1999, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). By decision and order of this Court dated April 3, 2000, the appeal from the judgment was deemed withdrawn. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 197, 716 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galimi-v-galimi-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack