Galicks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

383 F. App'x 516
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 2010
DocketNos. 09-1972, 09-2441
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 383 F. App'x 516 (Galicks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Galicks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 383 F. App'x 516 (6th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge.

This matter was submitted to the panel on briefs on March 30, 2010, with arguments addressing the merits of the underlying order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”). On June 17, 2010, however, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, — U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 2635, 177 L.Ed.2d 162 (2010), holding that the Board lacks authorization to act when it has fewer than three current members. There is no dispute that the underlying order in this case was issued at a time when there were only two members on the Board.1 In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in New Process Steel, we sua sponte REMAND for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Labor Relations Board v. Galicks, Inc.
671 F.3d 602 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
383 F. App'x 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galicks-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-2010.