Galgano v. County of Putnam, New York

S.D. New York

Galgano v. County of Putnam, New York

DecidedSeptember 9, 2020

Docket7:16-cv-03572

StatusUnknown

This text of Galgano v. County of Putnam, New York (Galgano v. County of Putnam, New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Galgano v. County of Putnam, New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT mE Peeperwarear ae wee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK pee □ ROE LE BEE

ORDER Plaintiff, ~ against - 16 Civ, 3572 (RKME)(PED) County of Putnam, et al.

Defendants. PAUL E. DAVISON, U.S.MLJ.: This Order addresses a dispute regarding whether plaintiff is obligated to release treatment records of his psychotherapist, Mr. James Blechman. The parties have submitted letter-briefs, [Dkts. 372, 378, 380.] Familiarity with the record is assumed. Communications between a patient and his psychotherapist are privileged, Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 15 (1996). It is well-settled, however, that a party waives medical privileges when he “puts his medical condition into issue.” Ottawa Office Integration Inc. ¥. FTF Bus. Sys., Inc., 132 F.Supp. 2d 215, 220 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). In Sims v. Blot, 534 F.3d 117, 134 (2d Cir. 2008), the Court of Appeals determined that a plaintiff who wishes to avoid releasing otherwise privileged therapy records “may withdraw or formally abandon all claims for emotional distress in order to avoid forfeiting his psychotherapist-patient privilege.” Applying Sims, courts in this district confine the mental health claims of plaintiffs who do not release their treatment records to garden variety emotional distress. E. g. Suregova v. Vill. of Rye Brook, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147769 (S.D.N,Y Dec. 22, 2011)(Karas, J.) Notably, restricting a plaintiff to a “garden variety emotional distress”claim significantly limits the damages which may be recovered. See Lore v. City of Syracuse, 670 F.3d 127, 177-78 (2d Cir, 2012). In view of plaintiffs arguably broader descriptions of his emotional distress, plaintiff may withhold Mr. Blechman’s therapy records only provided that he enters into a stipulation formally disavowing any claim for non-garden-variety emotional injuries and expressly agreeing not to offer evidence regarding his therapy or any diagnosis he may have received. See e.g. Weber y. Res. Training Cir, Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist, Lexis 176848 at * 5 (2.D.N.Y. Dec, 23, )(requiring affidavit); Jucebs v. Conn. CMTY., Tech. Colleges, 258 F.R.D. 192, 197 (D. Conn. 2009),

'Because the treatment records are privileged, defendants’ argument that the records may be discoverable because they are relevant for other purposes is without merit, See Mercedes v. City of New York, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176963 at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2018).

Dated: September 9, 2020 White Plains, New York

— < ul E. Davison, U.S.M.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT mE Peeperwarear ae wee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK pee □ ROE LE BEE

ORDER Plaintiff, ~ against - 16 Civ, 3572 (RKME)(PED) County of Putnam, et al.

Defendants. PAUL E. DAVISON, U.S.MLJ.: This Order addresses a dispute regarding whether plaintiff is obligated to release treatment records of his psychotherapist, Mr. James Blechman. The parties have submitted letter-briefs, [Dkts. 372, 378, 380.] Familiarity with the record is assumed. Communications between a patient and his psychotherapist are privileged, Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 15 (1996). It is well-settled, however, that a party waives medical privileges when he “puts his medical condition into issue.” Ottawa Office Integration Inc. ¥. FTF Bus. Sys., Inc., 132 F.Supp. 2d 215, 220 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). In Sims v. Blot, 534 F.3d 117, 134 (2d Cir. 2008), the Court of Appeals determined that a plaintiff who wishes to avoid releasing otherwise privileged therapy records “may withdraw or formally abandon all claims for emotional distress in order to avoid forfeiting his psychotherapist-patient privilege.” Applying Sims, courts in this district confine the mental health claims of plaintiffs who do not release their treatment records to garden variety emotional distress. E. g. Suregova v. Vill. of Rye Brook, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147769 (S.D.N,Y Dec. 22, 2011)(Karas, J.) Notably, restricting a plaintiff to a “garden variety emotional distress”claim significantly limits the damages which may be recovered. See Lore v. City of Syracuse, 670 F.3d 127, 177-78 (2d Cir, 2012). In view of plaintiffs arguably broader descriptions of his emotional distress, plaintiff may withhold Mr. Blechman’s therapy records only provided that he enters into a stipulation formally disavowing any claim for non-garden-variety emotional injuries and expressly agreeing not to offer evidence regarding his therapy or any diagnosis he may have received. See e.g. Weber y. Res. Training Cir, Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist, Lexis 176848 at * 5 (2.D.N.Y. Dec, 23, )(requiring affidavit); Jucebs v. Conn. CMTY., Tech. Colleges, 258 F.R.D. 192, 197 (D. Conn. 2009),

'Because the treatment records are privileged, defendants’ argument that the records may be discoverable because they are relevant for other purposes is without merit, See Mercedes v. City of New York, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176963 at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2018).

Dated: September 9, 2020 White Plains, New York

— < ul E. Davison, U.S.M.J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Galgano v. County of Putnam, New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galgano-v-county-of-putnam-new-york-nysd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack