Galewski v. Clover Leaf Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Galewski v. Clover Leaf Casualty Co.

191 Ill. App. 496

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided February 24, 1915·No. Gen. No. 20,335·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Pusadotg, § 200*—operation of demurrer to admit facts only well pleaded. Where an accident insurance policy was set out in the declaration in haee verha, and from such policy it appeared that only a portion of the amount claimed could be due under its terms, a demurrer will not admit the amount claimed as a fact, since it does not appear to be a fact on the whole record, apart from the rule that a demurrer does not admit the amount claimed in the declaration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Pusadotg, § 200*—operation of demurrer to admit facts only well pleaded. Where an accident insurance policy was set out in the declaration in haee verha, and from such policy it appeared that only a portion of the amount claimed could be due under its terms, a demurrer will not admit the amount claimed as a fact, since it does not appear to be a fact on the whole record, apart from the rule that a demurrer does not admit the amount claimed in the declaration.

Galewski v. Clover Leaf Casualty Co., 191 Ill. App. 496 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

191 Ill. App. 496 (Galewski v. Clover Leaf Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related