Galeana v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Cristal Galeana, No. CV-24-03617-PHX-SMB

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 United States Magistrate Judge Alison Bachus has issued a report and 16 recommendations (“R&R”) (Doc. 21) recommending that the case be remanded for further 17 proceedings. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file 18 objections to the R&R. (R&R at 3) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No 19 objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); 21 United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the 22 Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Judge Bachus. 23 The Court will accept and adopt the R&R. 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of 25 Magistrate Judge Bachus (Doc. 21) is accepted. 26 … 27 … 28 … 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner of || Social Security is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings. The Clerk || of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case. 4 Dated this 6th day of August, 2025. 5 Se . ~P 6 SO ~

7 Gnvted States District ude. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-