Gale v. Van Lines
269 A.D.2d 195, 703 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1318
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered December 14, 1998, which denied an application to stay enforcement of a warehouseman’s lien upon the movant’s failure to appear in court on the return date of the application, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.
No appeal lies from an order, such as this, entered on default of the aggrieved party (CPLR 5511). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gale v. Van Lines, 269 A.D.2d 195, 703 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
269 A.D.2d 195 (Gale v. Van Lines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seinfeld v. Robinson
12 A.D.3d 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)