Gale v. Tuolumne County Water Co.
This text of 44 Cal. 43 (Gale v. Tuolumne County Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The complaint is sufficient as against the demurrer [46]*46interposed. The argument upon objections amounting to grounds of special demurrer merely, and which were not presented below, will not be considered here.
2. Upon examination of the record it is apparent that the findings of fact are supported by the evidence. The most that can he fairly claimed by the appellant in this regard is, that upon some of them the evidence is substantially conflicting, and we may add, that in our judgment, the great preponderance of the evidence in the case is in favor of the findings of the Court; but however this may be, there is clearly such a sufficiency of evidence in support of the findings that we must decline to disturb them.
Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed.
Keither Mr. Justice Bi-iodes nor Mr. Justice Crockett participated in this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Cal. 43, 1872 Cal. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gale-v-tuolumne-county-water-co-cal-1872.