Gale v. Hoysradt

New York Supreme Court

Gale v. Hoysradt

3 How. Pr. 47

DecidedApril 15, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 3 How. Pr. 47 (Gale v. Hoysradt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gale v. Hoysradt, 3 How. Pr. 47 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Bronson, Chief Justice

Granted the motion unless Plaintiff stipulated ; costs of motion to abide event in case of stipulation: and held, that the rule granting a new trial was for the benefit of the Plaintiff, and he was bound to take notice of the decision of the circuit judge, and if he neglected to efiter the rule, the Defendant might enter it for him, and then give notice and proceed under it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson, Chief Justice

Granted the motion unless Plaintiff stipulated ; costs of motion to abide event in case of stipulation: and held, that the rule granting a new trial was for the benefit of the Plaintiff, and he was bound to take notice of the decision of the circuit judge, and if he neglected to efiter the rule, the Defendant might enter it for him, and then give notice and proceed under it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 How. Pr. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gale-v-hoysradt-nysupct-1847.