Gale v. Chase

3 Johns. 147
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The authority to the justice to enter up the judgment, must be considered as a parol authority, and revocable by the defendant. What he stated to the justice, amounted to a revocation,"and a trial ought to have been had, to ascertain the amount due to the plaintiff, The judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gale v. Chase, 3 Johns. 147 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

3 Johns. 147 (Gale v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wier v. Bush
14 Ky. 429 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1823)