Galbreath v. Moore

2 Watts 86
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 15, 1833
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 2 Watts 86 (Galbreath v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Galbreath v. Moore, 2 Watts 86 (Pa. 1833).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have already determined that in a single transaction such as this, there is not a partnership to require the remedy to be by account-render. The parties were joint owners of the bonds, as they would have been had the price paid for them been the original consideration and they the obligees. There were no accounts with third persons to be settled; and one of the joint owners might recover in assumpsit his proportion of the money paid to the other, as so much received to his use.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Gartman
3 Pa. D. & C. 329 (Berks County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1922)
Rosenblatt v. Weinman
74 A. 54 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Welch v. Miller
59 A. 1065 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Mason v. Sieglitz
22 Colo. 320 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1896)
Marsh v. N. W. Nat. Ins. Co.
16 F. Cas. 815 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1872)
Knerr v. Hoffman
65 Pa. 126 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)
Wright v. Cumpsty
41 Pa. 102 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1861)
Hamilton v. Hamilton's Executors
18 Pa. 20 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1851)
M'Fadden v. Erwin
2 Whart. 37 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Watts 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galbreath-v-moore-pa-1833.